Author: Mark Young
Date: 15:25:42 09/13/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 13, 1998 at 17:32:54, Bruce Moreland wrote: > >On September 13, 1998 at 15:43:41, Mark Young wrote: > > >>I don’t have a problem with Fritz 5 playing weak moves. It may play a weak move >>and think the move is best and rank it the highest move out of 4 or 5 possible >>moves it could play. What I don’t understand is why in your tournament, Fritz 5 >>continually played the lowest ranking moves, move after move and game after >>game. This is not normal behavior for Fritz 5 to act in such a way. That is my >>problem with your games. So the question is why did Fritz 5 continually play >>lower ranking moves over moves Fritz 5 thought from its own book tree were >>better? If that was normal for Fritz 5 to do this I would not have a problem, >>but it is not normal for Fritz 5 to act in such a way. The pattern is clear and >>evident in your games that fritz liked lower percentage move over higher >>percentage moves in your tournament. That suggests some kind of problem and >>anyone looking at the data would agree. > >Post the games, post the percentages, please. You are making a conclusion based >upon data, please show us the data. > >bruce I have already posted the data! It is on this site, If people disagree with my data and conclusions post your own data and conclusion to refute it. So far I have seen none that do. I did my work, now do yours. If my data is wrong, that can only be shown by posting other data from other power books, or better yet have Thorsten post the moves and the percentage of all the moves in the games for the tournament from the opening book. And see if my conclusions still holds up. My book is not different from Thorstens, I know of only one power book. If I am wrong and Thorsten’s power book shows that Fritz 5 played the best moves and there is no pattern of low percentage moves being played over higher percentage moves played. Then show me the data that refutes it. Thorsten has seen my data, and commented on it. He knows what I have posted. If he disagrees with my data and conclusion or anyone else does. Post your data and finding to refute mine. I bet Thorsten won’t because it will show the same pattern I showed. So I say again show me the data that refutes my data and conclusions. If you can't or won't do it. Then there is not much more to say.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.