Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: extracting bit from bitboard slow on P4 in C

Author: Bob Durrett

Date: 16:57:54 11/18/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 18, 2002 at 14:47:52, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

<snip>

>The NET 7.0 no one can use because you can decompile it too well.

<snip>

Help!  Am I reading this out of context?

If I purchase a computer with Windows XP and then purchase that compiler, I will
not be able to use it because "you can decompile it too well"???

(a)  What does that mean?  [Decompile?  Decompile too well? Decompile WHAT too
well?]  Go from listing of maching language instructions back to source code?

(b)  Would anybody be wasting their money by purchasing that computer and
compiler?

Are you concerned about keeping your source code secret?  So that DIEP can be
commercialized but to keep the competition [Fritz] from stealing your ideas?

I once worked with a team of top-notch ["Cracker Jack"] programmers to obtain a
detailed flow chart from an object program.  It took months and then when we had
the flow chart, we were still a long way from understanding the program.  A year
later we finally were done.

If you really want to keep your source code secret, maybe you should program in
machine language to start with.  Perhaps there is some sort of "encription" that
would help to make it impossible for anybody to decipher your machine
instructions list.

Bob D.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.