Author: Harald Faber
Date: 05:20:46 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2002 at 00:14:29, K. Burcham wrote: >Chess Tiger 15 vs List 5.0 > >Chess Tiger played 27.Rxb7 >I thought this was also a bad move, but this analysis shows Deep Fritz playing >same move. > > [D] 4r3/1p4pk/6p1/pRP1np2/P1q1rB2/2P3PP/2Q1PR2/6K1 w - - 0 1 The whole opening line is bad for white, so also in this position white can only choose between pest and cholera. >Deep Fritz 7: > > = (0.00) Depth: 14/36 00:01:04 102377kN >27.Kf1 Qd5 28.Kg1 Qc4 > = (0.00) Depth: 15/40 00:03:56 373793kN >27.Kf1 Nd7 28.Bd6 Qxa4 29.Qxa4 Rxa4 30.g4 Nf6 31.gxf5 Ra1+ 32.Kg2 gxf5 33.Rxb7 >Kg6 > = (-0.03) Depth: 16/40 00:08:27 804573kN >27.Qb3! > = (0.00) Depth: 16/40 00:09:07 868266kN >27.Qb3 Qxb3 28.Rxb3 Rxa4 29.Rxb7 Rc4 30.Rb5 Nc6 31.Bd6 Rxc3 32.Rb6 Nb4 33.Rb7 >Rc1+ > = (-0.12) Depth: 17/41 00:11:40 1119067kN >27.Kf1! > = (-0.09) Depth: 17/48 00:18:52 1808808kN >27.Kf1 Nd7 28.Bd6 Nf6 29.Qd2 Qxa4 30.Rxb7 R4e6 31.Kg1 Ne4 32.Qf4 Qa1+ 33.Rf1 > = (-0.16) Depth: 18/46 00:37:43 3636517kN >27.Qb3! > = (-0.12) Depth: 18/47 00:40:17 3887805kN >27.Qb3 Qxb3 28.Rxb3 Rxa4 29.Rxb7 Rc4 30.Bg5 Kg8 31.Rc7 Rxc3 32.Bf4 a4 33.Rf1 Kh7 > = (-0.12) Depth: 19/46 01:06:11 6463933kN >27.Qb3 Qxb3 28.Rxb3 Rxa4 29.Rxb7 Rc4 30.Bg5 Kg8 31.Rc7 Rxc3 32.Bf4 a4 33.Rf1 g5 >34.Rc1 > = (-0.19) Depth: 20/50 02:05:49 12310426kN, tb=1 >27.Rxb7! > = (-0.16) Depth: 20/56 06:26:22 38157557kN, tb=4 This analysis shows a good chance that DeepFritz 7 would not play Rxb7 in such a tournament game when it takes >6 hours to jump on Rxb7. Anyway, Kf1 was the move List expected.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.