Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Quality Poll

Author: Alastair Scott

Date: 07:34:11 11/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 18, 2002 at 22:52:36, Will Singleton wrote:

>In an effort to reduce noise (ie, floods of idiotic messages), and to encourage
>literate and/or salient messages, I propose we do a CCC poll.  Remember those?
>Each regular poster (one who has posted a message in the last 14 days) is
>listed, along with a choice.  Choices are 1) Top-notch, 2) Good, 3) OK, 4)
>marginal, and 5) say what?  After each 14-day period, the rankings are listed.
>This would enable members to more efficiently use the board.  It might also have
>the desirable effect of discouraging those folks who continue to post junk to
>desist, while encouraging more relevant and enlightened discussion.
>
>I originally thought of this as a joke, but it seems to have merit.  It might
>actually increase the value of the board.
>
>Variations on the theme are possible.  Members may have a number affixed to
>their posts, indicating the value placed upon their thoughts.  Perhaps
>color-coded.

Unfortunately not a good idea; there is always a minority of contributors who
find manipulating ratings more interesting than actually posting. Lurkers can do
real damage whereas, without such a feedback system, they merely ... lurk.

I write as someone with scars on my back from a previous experiment along those
lines :)

I would hardly say there are "floods" of idiotic messages. Maybe a small
trickle; if you want to see a far greater proportion go to rec.games.chess.*
I've been there over the past couple of weeks - first time since about four
years ago - and am amazed to see the same minority of people posting the same
nonsense now as then. Do they - can they - ever stop?

Alastair



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.