Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Quality Poll

Author: Bob Durrett

Date: 08:13:05 11/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2002 at 10:49:43, Will Singleton wrote:

>On November 19, 2002 at 09:46:39, Jon Dart wrote:
>
>>
>>Maybe you should take a look at how slashdot (http://www.slashdot.org) does it.
>>They have a ranking system for posts and a filtering mechanism, so you can only
>>see high-rated posts if you want.
>>
>>It works pretty well for that site. But IMO this forum doesn't really need this
>>kind of system because the traffic isn't all that high. Also there is a cost in
>>time & effort to this feature because people have to rank things.
>>
>>I'm reasonably happy with the current system of just eliminating really bad or
>>off-topic posts through moderation.
>>
>>--Jon
>
>I didn't know other forums had ranking systems, I thought I'd actually had a
>good idea. :)  But I can see where it might be abused.  Might be interesting on
>a trial basis, though I guess Steve/Tim would be loathe to make major mods to
>the system without good reason.
>
>Will

The solution is obvious!  Make each user of CCC pay $50 per year for access to
this bulletin board.  Then take the money, send me half, and give the rest to a
full-time paid "censor extraordinaire."  : )

Incidentally, interesting bulletins often receive plenty of response, resulting
in long threads.  But some excellent bulletins elicit no response for one reason
or another.

As my wife says:  "Why fix somthin' which ain't broke?"

Truly, CCC as it is today is a supurb bulletin board.  The people here deserve
the utmost respect and appreciation.  This is a great bulletin board and so are
the people.  Don't change anything!

Bob D.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.