Author: Ricardo R Santana
Date: 09:07:31 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
Ok, I agree with you.... but I was not really trying to "point the finger" to ssdf list guys... I was just trying to make things clear .... BTW, if I am not wrong, the in an old ssdf list, fritz (and maybe junior) appeared in the the top of the list - but only these two programs were running in a better machine. I do not call this fair too. So, if we want to make things better, we should just try to talk about it....thatś my point. And sorry if I were too strong in my words... Ricardo Sant Ana On November 19, 2002 at 11:49:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On November 19, 2002 at 10:10:01, Ricardo R Santana wrote: > >>Quite simple: "they" did not want chessmaster 9000 (expecially the new >>personality) to get first place !! Can you imagine some deep xxxx - who draw >>against a great k player - not in the first place ??? >> >>and by that way, who cares about it ? I am sure this discution will not get too >>long and nothing will happen. >> >>thanks >>Ricardo Sant Ana >> >>PS: I am sure new cm9000 personality will beat the new deep xxxx .....BTW, could>anyone suggest a good ssdf rating for the new cm9000 personality ?? > >In my opinion your "accusation" against SSDF is not at all justified. They are >doing a great job and they play thousands of games with no intention to prefer a >specific program. SSDF have however always stated that they are only testing >programs with default style and books and this may be the reason why Chessmaster >8000/9000 is not better classified in the SSDF rating list. >Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.