Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Quality Poll

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 09:29:22 11/19/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 19, 2002 at 03:51:25, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On November 18, 2002 at 22:52:36, Will Singleton wrote:
>
>>In an effort to reduce noise (ie, floods of idiotic messages), and to encourage
>>literate and/or salient messages, I propose we do a CCC poll.  Remember those?
>>Each regular poster (one who has posted a message in the last 14 days) is
>>listed, along with a choice.  Choices are 1) Top-notch, 2) Good, 3) OK, 4)
>>marginal, and 5) say what?  After each 14-day period, the rankings are listed.
>>This would enable members to more efficiently use the board.  It might also have
>>the desirable effect of discouraging those folks who continue to post junk to
>>desist, while encouraging more relevant and enlightened discussion.
>
>Hmm... who really cares what the majority thinks about message or poster
>quality? If we assume that the majority of members are pinheads, then we would
>be encouraging that kind of messages. Assuming that pinheads can unite and agree
>on something.
>
>I would prefer a more aesthetic approach. Everyone that refuse to apply
>capitalization and/or punctuation should be banned. I would also ban those that
>include member names in the subject. Not to mention the folks incapable of even
>nominal spelling skills. I think the list can be expanded until the point where
>only the good guys are left.
>
>Regards,
>Mogens


As long as you give special consideration to Martin Fierz, who is
capitalization-challenged but has great posts.  ;-)



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.