Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:30:37 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2002 at 13:55:13, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 19, 2002 at 13:03:46, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I did not analyze the games to find if the reason is a better book of ruffian >>relative to the commercial programs. > >Uri, I would have expected that at least _you_ would have looked at >the error margins. > >-- >GCP I know that the error margin is big and we need to wait for more games but I also know that peter berger found in his tests that Ruffian scores better at 30 4 and not at 5 2 time control. I do not claim that ruffian is better at 120/40 and statistical error is one possible explanation for the results. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.