Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: significant math

Author: Russell Reagan

Date: 13:08:58 11/19/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 19, 2002 at 15:37:24, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>Please show EVIDENCE.

Crafty gets 302,000 nps on my machine. Yace gets 267,000 nps on my machine. That
looks like bitboards are more than breaking even to me.

• Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:18:48 11/19/02
  • Re: significant math Sune Fischer 02:05:25 11/20/02
    • Re: significant math Steffan Westcott 02:37:43 11/20/02
      • Re: significant math Sune Fischer 02:44:10 11/20/02
        • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 07:57:01 11/20/02
          • Re: significant math Sune Fischer 08:07:32 11/20/02
            • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 08:15:17 11/20/02
              • Re: significant math Sune Fischer 08:39:14 11/20/02
                • Re: significant math Steffan Westcott 13:52:38 11/20/02
                  • Re: significant math Sune Fischer 14:58:33 11/20/02
                    • Re: significant math Steffan Westcott 15:58:54 11/20/02
                • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 11:11:57 11/20/02
        • Re: significant math Steffan Westcott 04:13:51 11/20/02
          • Re: significant math Sune Fischer 04:35:46 11/20/02
            • Re: significant math Steffan Westcott 06:37:11 11/20/02
              • Re: significant math Gerd Isenberg 12:17:57 11/20/02
                • Re: significant math Steffan Westcott 15:15:49 11/20/02
                  • Re: significant math Gerd Isenberg 23:32:50 11/20/02
              • Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 09:55:07 11/20/02
                • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Steffan Westcott 14:57:12 11/20/02
                  • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 02:55:59 11/21/02
                    • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Steffan Westcott 03:47:24 11/21/02
                      • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 12:23:55 11/21/02
                        • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Steffan Westcott 16:17:46 11/21/02
                          • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 23:49:05 11/21/02
                            • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Gerd Isenberg 04:42:51 11/22/02
                              • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 08:53:54 11/22/02
                              • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Sune Fischer 08:37:56 11/22/02
                                • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Gerd Isenberg 10:20:35 11/22/02
                                  • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Sune Fischer 13:17:29 11/22/02
                                • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 08:58:34 11/22/02
                                  • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Sune Fischer 09:19:42 11/22/02
                                    • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 09:52:54 11/22/02
                                      • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Steffan Westcott 16:08:27 11/22/02
                                        • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 16:44:52 11/22/02
                                          • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Steffan Westcott 17:19:09 11/22/02
                                      • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Sune Fischer 10:38:50 11/22/02
                                        • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 11:01:19 11/22/02
                            • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Alessandro Damiani 00:24:24 11/22/02
                      • Re: Natural move generation with bitboards (was Re:significant math) Daniel Clausen 03:55:11 11/21/02
  • Re: significant math Russell Reagan 13:27:31 11/19/02
    • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:30:28 11/19/02
    • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:29:49 11/19/02
• Re: significant math Dan Andersson 13:14:07 11/19/02
  • Re: significant math Russell Reagan 13:22:14 11/19/02
    • Re: significant math Dan Andersson 20:54:40 11/19/02
      • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 22:06:34 11/19/02
        • Re: significant math Dan Andersson 01:00:20 11/20/02
          • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 07:59:33 11/20/02
            • Re: significant math Dan Andersson 13:52:11 11/20/02
              • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 15:34:35 11/20/02
              • Re: significant math Sune Fischer 14:37:08 11/20/02
                • Re: significant math Vincent Diepeveen 21:00:13 11/21/02
                  • Re: significant math Sune Fischer 03:24:41 11/22/02
        • Re: significant math Uri Blass 22:50:38 11/19/02
          • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 08:01:29 11/20/02
          • Re: significant math Uri Blass 22:52:20 11/19/02
    • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:24:36 11/19/02
      • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:31:33 11/19/02
        • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:33:40 11/19/02
          • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:42:21 11/19/02
            • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:51:35 11/19/02
              • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:53:48 11/19/02
                • Re: significant math Eugene Nalimov 14:15:46 11/19/02
                • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:59:29 11/19/02
                  • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 15:03:28 11/19/02
                    • Re: ftp news Robert Hyatt 15:37:42 11/20/02
                    • Re: ftp news Robert Hyatt 15:36:58 11/20/02
                  • Re: significant math Eugene Nalimov 14:16:28 11/19/02
          • Re: significant math Russell Reagan 13:38:03 11/19/02
            • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:43:31 11/19/02
      • Re: significant math Russell Reagan 13:31:15 11/19/02
        • Re: significant math Alessandro Damiani 13:55:55 11/19/02
          • Re: significant math Vincent Diepeveen 16:13:39 11/19/02
            • Re: significant math Jeremiah Penery 17:23:11 11/19/02
              • Re: significant math Alessandro Damiani 00:44:20 11/20/02
                • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 08:02:55 11/20/02
            • Re: significant math Russell Reagan 17:09:11 11/19/02
              • Re: significant math Uri Blass 17:35:18 11/19/02
                • Re: significant math Russell Reagan 19:24:36 11/19/02
            • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 17:06:00 11/19/02
        • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:38:37 11/19/02
          • Re: significant math Robert Hyatt 13:51:36 11/19/02
            • Re: significant math Gian-Carlo Pascutto 13:56:35 11/19/02
              • Re: significant math Gerd Isenberg 14:25:26 11/19/02
        • Re: significant math Bob Durrett 13:37:33 11/19/02

This page took 0.04 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.