Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:23:30 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2002 at 16:14:06, Russell Reagan wrote: >On November 19, 2002 at 15:57:05, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>Then your argument is based on a worst-case situation, which >>makes it worthless IMHO. > >Did you read my post? I didn't say it would take 8 iterations, but I did say >that it would take 4 iterations on average. I take the best case scenario for >you, which is 1 iteration, and then I take the worst case scenario for you, >which is 8 iterations, I average them, get 4.5 iterations, give you the benefit >of the doubt and call it 4 itertions, and you still say that I'm basing my >argument on a worst case situation? Please explain. You can't average a best case and a worst case and call that the 'average' case. In general, knowing if a piece is on a file, is 1 memory load and 1 test for me. My worst case may be 8, my average case is *1*. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.