Author: Bob Durrett
Date: 13:37:33 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2002 at 16:31:15, Russell Reagan wrote: >On November 19, 2002 at 16:24:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On November 19, 2002 at 16:22:14, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>You can't prove either to be clearly better than the other, but you can give >evidence that they are comparable in terms of performance. >> >>You haven't done that. You've shown that they reach similar NPS. >> >>NPS =/= performance > >You need to clearly define what the hell you want then. Vincent too. You two sit >there and demand proof or evidence without providing any of your own, and then >when someone provides what you ask for you say "That's not what I asked for." or >"that isn't valid" or whatever the excuse of the day is. Make it clear what you >want, or don't ask. > >Sounds an awfully lot like what goes on at r.g.c.c to me. People responding with >stupid things like, "No..." with no "evidence" to support it. Gosh, Russell. Don't try to pour cold water on those guys. There's nothing like a Hyatt/Diep "Friendly Chat" to liven up this quiet bulletin boards. This is fun! I havn't seen so many bulletins posted in such a short amount of time for quiet awhile. Better to pour fuel on the fire. : ) Bob D.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.