Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: significant math

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 13:38:37 11/19/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 19, 2002 at 16:31:15, Russell Reagan wrote:

>You need to clearly define what the hell you want then. Vincent too. You two sit
>there and demand proof or evidence without providing any of your own, and then
>when someone provides what you ask for you say "That's not what I asked for." or
>"that isn't valid" or whatever the excuse of the day is. Make it clear what you
>want, or don't ask.
>Sounds an awfully lot like what goes on at r.g.c.c to me. People responding >with stupid things like, "No..." with no "evidence" to support it.

I'm not providing any evidence because I've never made a statement
as to what is generally the best datastructure to use.

I don't think it's a good idea to do so without having substantial
evidence that you are right, and I don't have it. And from what I
have seen, neither have any of the other posters in this thread.


This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.