Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:38:37 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2002 at 16:31:15, Russell Reagan wrote: >You need to clearly define what the hell you want then. Vincent too. You two sit >there and demand proof or evidence without providing any of your own, and then >when someone provides what you ask for you say "That's not what I asked for." or >"that isn't valid" or whatever the excuse of the day is. Make it clear what you >want, or don't ask. > >Sounds an awfully lot like what goes on at r.g.c.c to me. People responding >with stupid things like, "No..." with no "evidence" to support it. I'm not providing any evidence because I've never made a statement as to what is generally the best datastructure to use. I don't think it's a good idea to do so without having substantial evidence that you are right, and I don't have it. And from what I have seen, neither have any of the other posters in this thread. -- GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.