Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 14:16:28 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
I have 4 in my office (and that's 4 more than I wish :-) ). And I believe Vincent used one on WCCC this summer, right? Thanks, Eugene On November 19, 2002 at 16:59:29, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 19, 2002 at 16:53:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Yep and I don't do it. I've given you _real_ numbers. Of course you can >>_always_ >>run the test that Bruce and I did for yourself. Crafty's source is available, >>so you have >>access to a bitmapper. Yours isn't a bitmapper so you have access to one that >>is not. >> >>Compile both using the same compiler on a 32 bit machine and on a 64 bit machine >>and >>see if one speeds up _more_ than the other. If so, you have to explain why that >>isn't >>attributed to the 64 bit architecture... > >I thought this thread was about current performance rather than future >performance. I've posted my opinion about bitboard vs nonbitboard as >soons as 64-bit machines become common somewhere below this post. > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.