Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 16:13:39 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 19, 2002 at 16:55:55, Alessandro Damiani wrote: >On November 19, 2002 at 16:31:15, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>On November 19, 2002 at 16:24:36, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On November 19, 2002 at 16:22:14, Russell Reagan wrote: >>> >>>>You can't prove either to be clearly better than the other, but you can give >evidence that they are comparable in terms of performance. >>> >>>You haven't done that. You've shown that they reach similar NPS. >>> >>>NPS =/= performance >> >>You need to clearly define what the hell you want then. Vincent too. You two sit >>there and demand proof or evidence without providing any of your own, and then >>when someone provides what you ask for you say "That's not what I asked for." or >>"that isn't valid" or whatever the excuse of the day is. Make it clear what you >>want, or don't ask. >> >>Sounds an awfully lot like what goes on at r.g.c.c to me. People responding with >>stupid things like, "No..." with no "evidence" to support it. > >It is easier to say "no, this doesn't work." than trying to do the work oneself. >Some politicians behave the same way. It is cheap. > >Alessandro A good definition of bitboards. My move generator is 2.0 times faster than the one of crafty, so there is no 'religion' here which i'm talking about. It's a simple measurement which can be done. DIEP is no exception then however. There are more non bitboarders over 2 times faster, like Yace. I bet Christophe is too. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.