Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 23:52:26 11/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2002 at 02:38:08, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 20, 2002 at 02:11:16, stuart taylor wrote: > >>That is something that I always want to know. >>Is it perhaps CM9K Utzinger? As that program/setting is said to be much stronger >>on long timings compared to blitz, in comparrison to the parity with other >>programs. >> >>I would do anything to have a program which trounced all others at 2 hours per >>move. > >No such program exists. The programs that are excellent at 40/2 will also be >excellent at one move per day or other very long time controls. > >No program is going to trounce all others at any time control. Just correct, but I would never say that CM9_Utz12n is best at 40 or 120'/40. This indeed strong CM9-setting has played 30 games (40'/40) against 13 of the best programs with a winning score of total 62 % CM9 X Program Games CM9 X Opp Score Time Hardware/HT CM9 X Aristarch 4.4 30 21.5 8.5 72% 40'/40 P3 650/32 CM9 X Chess Tiger 14 30 18 12 60% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 CM9 X Crafty 18.15 30 21.5 8.5 72% 40'/40 Dur 1.3/64 CM9 X Fritz 7.0.0.8 30 16.5 13.5 55% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 CM9 X GambitTiger2 ag 30 13 17 43% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 CM9 X Hiarcs 7.32 30 17 13 57% 40'/40 P3 650/32 CM9 X Hiarcs 8 30 16.5 13.5 55% 40'/40 P3 800/32 CM9 X Junior 7 30 16.5 13.5 55% 40'/40 Dur 1.3/64 CM9 X List 4.61 30 20.5 9.5 68% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 CM9 X Nimzo 7.32 30 20.5 9.5 68% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 CM9 X Ruffian 1.0.1 30 19.5 10.5 65% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 CM9 X Shredder 6.02 30 18 12 60% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 CM9 X Yace 0.99.56 30 21 9 70% 40'/40 Ath 1.3/64 CM9 X Total 390 240 150 62% 40'/40 Various But to say something more concrete we should have played 100 games each. http://www.beepworld.de/members39\utzinger Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.