Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:34:09 11/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2002 at 02:38:08, Dann Corbit wrote: >On November 20, 2002 at 02:11:16, stuart taylor wrote: > >>That is something that I always want to know. >>Is it perhaps CM9K Utzinger? As that program/setting is said to be much stronger >>on long timings compared to blitz, in comparrison to the parity with other >>programs. >> >>I would do anything to have a program which trounced all others at 2 hours per >>move. > >No such program exists. The programs that are excellent at 40/2 will also be >excellent at one move per day or other very long time controls. I am not sure. a program may have bugs that happen only when you let it to calculate the same position for some hours. > >No program is going to trounce all others at any time control. How do you know? It is possible that one program is 100 elo better than other at 2 hours per move but if you want to play a lot of games to prove it in the end of the test there is going to be a new program. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.