Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Differences between 0x88 ,10x12 and Bitboards!?

Author: Roy Eassa

Date: 08:29:37 11/20/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 20, 2002 at 02:31:22, Anthony Cozzie wrote:

>On November 19, 2002 at 12:25:11, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>On November 19, 2002 at 11:35:24, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>Bitboards have a bit of a performance advantage on 64 bit processors,
>Here's a thought.  Bitboards are fundamentally the inverse of a standard board.
>A 0x88 board (or similar) answers the question "What is on square A".  A
>bitboard answers the question "A is on square What" (hmm, that didn't come out
>so well).  The point is, if you want to know what piece is on square 45 a 0x88
>will work well.  If want to know what squares your knights are on, a bitboard
>will work well.  This reminds me of the unique table in ROBDDs for some reason.
>I don't think these schemes are exclusive.  I know in zappa I have both a 64
>entry array and bitboards for all piece types.  Of course, zappa is not known
>for the brilliance of its evaluation or the speed of its move generation.

But it IS known for the brilliance of its music.  And I hear it might be moving
to Montana soon...

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.