Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 09:29:19 11/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2002 at 11:52:49, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >My very first thought after looking through this was: > >'You note that Heinz R=2/3 appears to be superior to >R=2 and R=3, but you don't include it in the comparison.' > Heinz reported the 10%-30% reductiong in tree size on DarkThought. This figure will vary from program to program. In Genesis, verified algorithm constructed a smaller tree than the adaptive one. Moreover, while the adaptive method strives to reach the same tactical strength as standard R = 2, the presented verified algorithm has greater average tactical strength than standard R = 2. Omid. >-- >GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.