Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 09:31:43 11/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2002 at 12:05:09, Tony Werten wrote: >On November 20, 2002 at 11:52:49, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>My very first thought after looking through this was: >> >>'You note that Heinz R=2/3 appears to be superior to >>R=2 and R=3, but you don't include it in the comparison.' > >From the data, I'd guess that both are about equal. I'll have a test after >diner. > The important difference is that verified null-move pruning on average yields greater tactical strength than standard R = 2. The smaller your quiescence search is, the better will be the performance of verified null-move pruning. Omid. >Tony > >> >>-- >>GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.