Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Verified Null-Move Pruning, ICGA 25(3)

Author: Vincent Diepeveen

Date: 11:53:45 11/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 20, 2002 at 11:52:49, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>My very first thought after looking through this was:
>
>'You note that Heinz R=2/3 appears to be superior to
>R=2 and R=3, but you don't include it in the comparison.'
>
>--
>GCP

I would disagree with such a conclusion anyway. R=3 always
works better for me in the year 2002 :)

In 1996 just R=2 was ok. In 1997 i used a combination of R=3 and R=2,
and in 2002 such a combination is not possible. R=3 gives me a ply
extra compared to a combination of R=3 + R=2. *on average*.








This page took 0.03 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.