Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 11:53:45 11/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2002 at 11:52:49, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >My very first thought after looking through this was: > >'You note that Heinz R=2/3 appears to be superior to >R=2 and R=3, but you don't include it in the comparison.' > >-- >GCP I would disagree with such a conclusion anyway. R=3 always works better for me in the year 2002 :) In 1996 just R=2 was ok. In 1997 i used a combination of R=3 and R=2, and in 2002 such a combination is not possible. R=3 gives me a ply extra compared to a combination of R=3 + R=2. *on average*.
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.