Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Doesn't appear to work for me (full data)

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 15:50:46 11/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 20, 2002 at 18:46:19, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On November 20, 2002 at 18:43:15, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>
>>On November 20, 2002 at 18:36:13, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>
>>>I think the following data speaks for itself. Old is Heinz+big quiescent,
>>>New is Omid+small quiescent.
>>>
>>>Warning: node count is different!
>>>
>>>Node count is for same depth only.
>>>
>>>             Old             New            Ratio
>>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>>Nodes:    329973801       399142126         120.96%
>>>Time:         49737           65105         130.90%
>>>Depth:            9.73            9.91        0.19
>>>Solved:         126             115
>>>
>>>--
>>>GCP
>>
>>What does the small quiescence consist of?
>
>Just captures, ordered by SEE, tossing out obviously losing ones.
>

Could you please compare (Adptv + small quiesc) vs (Vrfd +small quiesc) ?


>--
>GCP



This page took 0.06 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.