Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Doesn't appear to work for me (full data)

Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto

Date: 16:02:49 11/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 20, 2002 at 18:54:30, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>>Could you please compare (Adptv + small quiesc) vs (Vrfd +small quiesc) ?

When I have more time.

If you want more data, I expect others will post results
from their programs as well. Maybe those are more encouraging...

>BTW, please allocate more time for each position. The deeper you go, the >greater will be the advantage of verified null-move (see Figure 4 of my
>article).

Compared to R=2! But it scales inferior to R=3. So I don't expect
more time to give it an advantage compared to Heinz Adaptive Nullmove.

>Or you might want to conduct a test to a fixed depth of 10 plies, and then
>compare the total node count and number of solved positions.

Fixed depth tests are nonsense. I play games with a clock, not with
a fixed amount of plies.

--
GCP



This page took 0.08 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.