Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 16:02:49 11/20/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 20, 2002 at 18:54:30, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>Could you please compare (Adptv + small quiesc) vs (Vrfd +small quiesc) ? When I have more time. If you want more data, I expect others will post results from their programs as well. Maybe those are more encouraging... >BTW, please allocate more time for each position. The deeper you go, the >greater will be the advantage of verified null-move (see Figure 4 of my >article). Compared to R=2! But it scales inferior to R=3. So I don't expect more time to give it an advantage compared to Heinz Adaptive Nullmove. >Or you might want to conduct a test to a fixed depth of 10 plies, and then >compare the total node count and number of solved positions. Fixed depth tests are nonsense. I play games with a clock, not with a fixed amount of plies. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.