Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Best Analysis Engine?

Author: Stuart Smith

Date: 23:58:22 11/20/02

Go up one level in this thread


Hi John, I play most of my games against on CM9K against the Chessmaster for two
main reasons; he seems most likely to stick to the strongest opening book moves
(which I am keen to practise) and he makes the replying moves very quickly so I
don't have to wait long to get thrashed ;-). If I play, for example, Josh 8 yrs
old, he takes several minutes per move - why?

Once the game is over I set the analysis mode to 30-60 seconds and let it do its
thing (now [arrived today] that I have a 2.2GHz P4 with 1Gb RDRAM machine I
suspect it can do a better job than my previous 450MHz P3 in the same 30-60 secs
slot?). I purchased this new PC (running XP) mostly to play chess on and get
around the CM9K bug on my W2K system whereby tournaments are always played
against ChessMaster - do people get obsessive about chess??

A lot of the analysis shows no comments against a particular although it does
show a resultant score which is of some use; what I would like to see is 'if you
did this or this or this ...' type of output.

Finally, I use the 'Advice' option quite often and get slightly frustrated when
after setting time to 300 seconds, it provides a sequence of moves; I make the
first move suggested and then CM makes a completely different move to the one
predicted.

I must add that these are minor comments for what is an overall great package
for playing/teaching chess (although I must say I am concerned that its future
development has been 'compromised' by UbiSoft letting go of you).

Many Thanks to all who replied.

p.s. now that I have 1Gb RDRAM should I change the hash table size from the
default - if so, how do I do this?






This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.