Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Blitz tournament results

Author: Kai Skibbe

Date: 22:58:33 09/14/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 14, 1998 at 17:04:40, Heiko Mikala wrote:

>Hi everybody!
>
>During the last 2 weeks I played a small ;-) blitz tournament on my PC (Pentium
>200 MMX, 64 MB ram), using Winboard 4.0.0 and five freely available engines.
>
>The participants were:
>
>- Crafty 15.18
>- Comet A90
>- Little Goliath V 1.05
>- Phalanx XVII
>- ZChess 0.92
>
>Each participant had to play 20 games against each other engine, so 200 games
>were played.
>
>All engines were configured to use 8 MB Hash tables, and pondering
>was disabled for all engines.
>
>
>Final standings (output using Rebel 8.0):
>
>   Name                  Tot      Score        +   «   -  Perc   Elo
>
>1. WCrafty-15_18          80   63.0 -  17.0   61   4  15   78%     0
>2. Comet-WB-A90           80   40.5 -  39.5   33  15  32   50%     0
>3. ZChess                 80   37.5 -  42.5   33   9  38   46%     0
>4. Phalanx-XVII           80   36.0 -  44.0   31  10  39   45%     0
>5. Goliath105             80   23.0 -  57.0   19   8  53   28%     0
>
>
>Crosstable:
>
>             1. Crafty   2.  Comet   3.Phalanx   4. ZChess   5.Goliath
>             ---------------------------------------------------------
>1. Crafty        -       14.5- 5.5   16.5- 3.5   17.0- 3.0   15.0- 5.0
>2. Comet      5.5-14.5       -       10.5- 9.5   13.0- 7.0   11.5- 8.5
>3. Phalanx    3.5-16.5    9.5-10.5       -        9.0-11.0   14.0- 6.0
>4. ZChess     3.0-17.0    7.0-13.0   11.0- 9.0       -       16.5- 3.5
>5. Goliath    5.0-15.0    8.5-11.5    6.0-14.0    3.5-16.5       -
>
>
>Obviously, Crafty is still ahead of the pack, at least in blitz games. Comet is
>second in this tournament, but ZChess and Phalanx are very close. A few more
>games could change the order of places 2-4 easily...
>Little Goliath finished on 5th and last place, but please don't forget, that Mr.
>Borgstaedt said in a post here on CCC, that version 1.05 had some bugs and that
>he was planning to release a new, bug-fixed version (which already happened
>now).
>
>Except for Crafty, all the above mentioned engines are available in newer
>versions already, and I'm looking forward to testing them :-)
>
>I also played some games in 60 minutes, which I'd like to mention:
>
>Game/60:
>
>ZChess  - Crafty  5-7
>ZChess  - Comet   6-4
>Goliath - Crafty  1-6
>Phalanx - Crafty  1-8
>

Hi Heiko,

I have played several games between Crafty and Phalanx17 and I think Phalanx has
a bug so it will loose many games in a match game (/mg=x). It has happened that
Phalanx scores 6-2 against another engine at blitz level and than loose the rest
of the games. When you take a look at the pgn-file you see that Phalanx looses
in <=40 moves. Sometime <=20 (!!).
Because of this I only play Phalanx with /mg=1 against other machines. So I get
very good results for Phalanx and I think it is very strong.
Could you please test it with the option /mg=1 and post or email me your
experiences ?

Best regards
Kai




>As you can see, ZChess seems to be very strong at longer time controls!
>And, to be fair, I should mention, that in the game against Crafty, the first 10
>games were played with alternating colors, but the last two games were played
>with Crafty as white. So normally there should be played two more games with
>ZChess as white... but I decided to stop testing version 0.92, because version
>0.97 is already available, and I want to continue with the new version.
>
>
>These results and many more can also be found at Dr. Vidanovic's Chess Homepage
>at   http://www.cent.co.yu/chess  Take a look at it!
>
>Ok, I hope you enjoyed this a little bit, greetings to all of you,
>
>Heiko.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.