Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Blitz tournament results

Author: Kai Skibbe

Date: 23:21:14 09/14/98

Go up one level in this thread


On September 15, 1998 at 02:11:10, Heiko Mikala wrote:

>
>On September 15, 1998 at 01:58:33, Kai Skibbe wrote:
>
>>On September 14, 1998 at 17:04:40, Heiko Mikala wrote:
>>>
>>>Final standings (output using Rebel 8.0):
>>>
>>>   Name                  Tot      Score        +   «   -  Perc   Elo
>>>
>>>1. WCrafty-15_18          80   63.0 -  17.0   61   4  15   78%     0
>>>2. Comet-WB-A90           80   40.5 -  39.5   33  15  32   50%     0
>>>3. ZChess                 80   37.5 -  42.5   33   9  38   46%     0
>>>4. Phalanx-XVII           80   36.0 -  44.0   31  10  39   45%     0
>>>5. Goliath105             80   23.0 -  57.0   19   8  53   28%     0
>>>
>>
>>Hi Heiko,
>>
>>I have played several games between Crafty and Phalanx17 and I think
>>Phalanx has a bug so it will loose many games in a match game (/mg=x).
>>It has happened that Phalanx scores 6-2 against another engine at blitz level
>>and than loose the rest of the games. When you take a look at the pgn-file
>>you see that Phalanx looses in <=40 moves. Sometime <=20 (!!).
>>Because of this I only play Phalanx with /mg=1 against other machines. So I
>>get very good results for Phalanx and I think it is very strong.
>>Could you please test it with the option /mg=1 and post or email me your
>>experiences ?
>
>Hi Kai,
>
>yes I found out about the bug too. It happens, whenever Phalanx plays many games
>in a row, without beeing restartet - for example in match-game mode in Winboard.
>The bug is, that it will stop thinking, it will play it's moves immediately
>without using it's time.
>Because of this I decided to play all Winboard matches with the flags /-reuse
>and /-reuse2. In this way the engines are restarted for every new game, instead
>of only starting a new game with the 'new' command using the same engine.
>I had no problems with Phalanx since then.

Hi Heiko,

Thank you for the tip ! I will test it :-)


Best regards
Kai


>
>There should be no 'bad' Phalanx games in my results, because I replayed those
>first games, in which this phenomenon took place.
>
>And yes, I too think, that Phalanx is very strong, I'm looking forward to
>testing version XVIII !
>
>Heiko.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.