Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:41:07 11/21/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 21, 2002 at 12:25:19, GuyHaworth wrote: > >It ought to be possible to substitute for the 5-1 EGTs with some more compact >rulebase. Has 5-1 ever occurred over a serious board? I guess not. > >How would one set about creating that rulebase to cover all situations? Is it >just "5-1 = WIN"? > >g That is what I was thinking. What I would probably do is to set WIN = something pretty big, and add to that my EvaluateMate() result so that it won't just randomly move around once it hits such an ending... it would still recognize stalemates of course, and it would try to drive the losing side to the edge/corner. That ought to work, by faking this up in EGTBProbe().
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.