Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Doesn't appear to work for me neither.

Author: Antonio Dieguez

Date: 14:30:27 11/21/02

Go up one level in this thread

I get more nodes per ply than with r=2 even.
And less test positions solved, that is.

I did the tests at few seconds, and the searches to fixed depth to average depth
of 8. I could try longer searches but it doesn't smell good.

I get very similar results with and without the research for zugzwang.

I have seen papers that say that something is the best, or better than other
thing, for example that MTD is superior to other searches and jokes like that (I
mean the strong claim as a joke. It could be true but just because it worked for
him/them is nothing.), I though this time was going to be different... but it
looks it won't... and look at the start of the Conclusion phew! you could have
put some "In Genesis,..."

Still, I will keep trying to make something like this work (as many other
things), thanks for sharing.

This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.