Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 02:50:09 11/22/02

Vincent,

You haven't read the article yet. READ IT. I have described everything I have
done quite clearly, and have presented the results. All the node counts are also
available at my website.

Regarding your checkmate question: except for the "Mate in 4" and "Mate in 5"
positions which I was interested to know only if the checkmating was found or
not, in all other test positions (ECM, WCS, Neishtadt) the search was conducted
to the mentioned depth even if a checkmate is found at eariler plies. This was
done in order to ensure that the fixed depth results are comparable in terms of
tree size.

Omid.

Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Uri Blass 04:21:13 11/22/02
- Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Robert Hyatt 07:30:34 11/22/02
  - Re: Verifiying mate depth Dennis Breuker 08:24:14 11/22/02
    - Re: Verifiying mate depth Uri Blass 08:35:00 11/22/02
  - Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Uri Blass 07:39:16 11/22/02
    - Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Tony Werten 08:35:38 11/22/02
      - Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Andreas Herrmann 09:58:42 11/22/02
        
        Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Tony Werten 11:11:40 11/22/02
        
        Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Andreas Herrmann 12:21:11 11/22/02
    - Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Daniel Clausen 08:03:01 11/22/02
      - Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Uri Blass 08:14:41 11/22/02
- Re: Node count differences with Omids verification search Omid David Tabibi 04:49:23 11/22/02

This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.