Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 04:30:13 11/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2002 at 07:18:48, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >Because we were discussing the performance on your specific program. But if we >wanted to draw a wider conclusion regarding the algorithm, we had to know all >those details. Yes. >Besides, you might agree that the results you posted with fixed time, while >being practical for testing your program, are not general enough to be >publishable. Howso? At best it can provide evidence that the method is better for my program. The same is true for you. I already posted evidence that despite your 'more general' results it does not work for my program. I don't see the logic in cosidering one publishable and the other not. To make it really interesting, it would have been interesting to also implement it in Crafy (or another free program) and verify the results there. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.