Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:14:41 11/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2002 at 11:03:01, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On November 22, 2002 at 10:39:16, Uri Blass wrote: > >[snip] > >>I do not know what most do but I do not care after finding a mate to find the >>shorter mate. > >Do you test that if you found a 'mate-in-N' in the previous move, that you now >have found a 'mate in N-1'? Otherwise your engine might delay the mate until >it's too late. > >Sargon No I do not test it but I test during search if there is repetition or 50 move rule. I do not plan to use hash tables for pruning the tree in the case that alpha tells me that there is a mate score so there should be no practical problem. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.