Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 09:17:47 11/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
Les, Unfortunately, there are lot of reasons why I don't want to do that: (1) I don't want to write new code for the generator. I am completely out of time. (2) To generate those TBs I need computer -- and that computer can better do something more useful. (3) I spend some my time when TBs are generating -- bookkeeping, verification, etc. Thanks, Eugene On November 22, 2002 at 09:23:04, Les Fernandez wrote: >On November 21, 2002 at 15:36:06, Eugene Nalimov wrote: > >>I produced all 6+2 and 3+3 pawnless TBs, and put statistics at Bob's site. I >>have no plans to work on 5+1 TBs in the future. > >Hi Eugene, > >I understand that for most of the 5+1 positions that it would be a waste of >space but I am very much in need of just the tbs files for all non pawn >positions. I am conducting some analyses on these 6 piece positions and >desperately need a complete set to support some findings that I am working on. >Can you tell me just how many non pawn 6 piece sets we are talking about here >that would be needed to have a complete set of non pawn positions with 6 pieces >and secondly any idea how much time it would take to generate them. If the time >to generate them is not to unreasonable perhaps you could still generate them >just so we could have the tbs files at which point you still would not have to >include the actaul corresponding egtb files on Bobs ftp site. > >Humbly asking for a favor <S>. > >Les > >> >>Thanks, >>Eugene >> >>On November 21, 2002 at 01:49:05, Les Fernandez wrote: >> >>>Hi Eugene, >>> >>>Any idea as to about when you expect to have atleast the *.tbs stat files for >>>"all non pawn" positions finished? At the moment I am interested in only the >>>tbx files and not the actual egtb files. >>> >>>Thanks, >>> >>>Les
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.