Computer Chess Club Archives




Subject: Re: Verified Null-Move Pruning, ICGA 25(3)

Author: Dave Gomboc

Date: 14:29:35 11/22/02

Go up one level in this thread

On November 22, 2002 at 07:26:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>I expect it to do better at longer times too of course, for the reason
>pointed out in this thread than it becomes more comparable to R=3. R=3 is
>superior in Deep Sjeng compared to verified R=3, so as verified gets
>closer to R=3, it will do better, but I don't expect it to do
>"better than R=3".
>I have different testing priorities right now because in any case it
>looks vastly inferior to what I am doing now (not R=3 and not R=2/3).

What are you doing now?


This page took 0.36 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.