Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 14:55:42 11/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2002 at 17:43:13, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 22, 2002 at 17:29:35, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On November 22, 2002 at 07:26:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>I expect it to do better at longer times too of course, for the reason >>>pointed out in this thread than it becomes more comparable to R=3. R=3 is >>>superior in Deep Sjeng compared to verified R=3, so as verified gets >>>closer to R=3, it will do better, but I don't expect it to do >>>"better than R=3". >>> >>>I have different testing priorities right now because in any case it >>>looks vastly inferior to what I am doing now (not R=3 and not R=2/3). >> >>What are you doing now? > >Ultra-Secret-Commercial-Hyper-Mega-Pruning-Technique XBHY-356 > >:) > BTW, have you tried futility and extended futility pruning as described by Heinz? >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.