Author: Timothy J. Frohlick
Date: 23:45:03 11/22/02
Go up one level in this thread
Hiarcs 8 - Frohlick,T 5k2/pp2r2p/2p2qp1/2Pn1p2/PPN1p2P/3rP3/5PP1/1QR1R1K1 w - - 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 8: AMD 1400 MHz 512 MB RAM 1.h5 gxh5 ³ (-0.45) Depth: 1 00:00:00 1.Qb2 Qxb2 2.Nxb2 = (-0.15) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 1.Qb2 Qxb2 2.Nxb2 = (-0.15) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 1.Qb2 Qxb2 2.Nxb2 = (-0.15) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 1.Qb2 Qxb2 2.Nxb2 = (-0.15) Depth: 3/9 00:00:00 1.Qb2 Qxb2 ³ (-0.41) Depth: 4/10 00:00:00 1.Qb2 Qxb2 2.Nxb2 Rb3 3.Nc4 Nxb4 µ (-0.97) Depth: 4/10 00:00:00 1.h5 gxh5 2.Nd6 Rd2 ³ (-0.38) Depth: 4/12 00:00:00 1.h5 gxh5 2.Nd6 Qe5 3.Red1 Rxd1+ 4.Rxd1 ³ (-0.38) Depth: 5/17 00:00:00 7kN 1.h5 gxh5 2.Nd6 Qe5 3.b5 Rg7 ³ (-0.58) Depth: 6/18 00:00:00 24kN 1.g3 Rd7 2.Nd6 Ra3 3.a5 Nc3 ³ (-0.55) Depth: 6/18 00:00:00 45kN 1.g3 Rd7 2.Nd6 Rd2 3.b5 cxb5 4.axb5 ³ (-0.41) Depth: 7/19 00:00:00 78kN 1.g3 Rd7 2.Kg2 Nc3 3.Qa1 R7d5 4.Na5 Qg7 ³ (-0.61) Depth: 8/20 00:00:01 241kN 1.g3 f4 2.Rf1 Nc3 3.Qa1 Kg7 4.Kh2 f3 5.Nd6 ³ (-0.44) Depth: 9/27 00:00:08 1156kN 1.g3 Rd7 2.Kg2 Kg8 3.a5 Nc7 4.Nd6 Nb5 5.Qa2+ Kf8 6.Nxb5 cxb5 ³ (-0.55) Depth: 10/27 00:00:28 3945kN 1.g3 Rd7 2.Kg2 a6 3.a5 h6 4.h5 gxh5 5.Rh1 Nc3 6.Qb2 Ke7 7.Rxh5 ³ (-0.39) Depth: 11/36 00:01:30 12407kN 1.g3 Kg8 2.a5 Rd7 3.Nd6 Qe5 4.Nc4 ³ (-0.45) Depth: 12/39 00:05:30 44505kN (Frohlick, Albuquerque 23.11.2002) On November 23, 2002 at 01:01:32, Mike S. wrote: >From a game Shredder 5.32 - Ruffian 1.0.1, 40/1h P3/700: > >[D]5k2/pp2r2p/2p2qp1/2Pn1p2/PPN1p2P/3rP3/5PP1/1QR1R1K1 w - - 0 1 > >Analysis by Shredder 5.32: > >37.Dxd3 exd3 > -+ (-4.29) Tiefe: 1/2 00:00:00 >37.h5 gxh5 38.b5 h4 39.bxc6 Dxc6 40.Db2 Df6 41.Dxf6+ Sxf6 42.Sd6 Td5 > = (0.11) Tiefe: 1/2 00:00:00 > = (-0.12) Tiefe: 15/30 00:31:54 508626kN > >Analysis by Chess Tiger 14.0: > >37.h5 Tc7 > ³ (-0.64) Tiefe: 8 00:00:00 138kN > ³ (-0.45) Tiefe: 15 00:10:29 212301kN > >Analysis by Fritz 7: > >37.h5 gxh5 38.b5 cxb5 39.axb5 Tg7 40.b6 axb6 41.Sxb6 Dg6 42.g3 h4 43.Sxd5 > ³ (-0.56) Tiefe: 7/23 00:00:00 160kN > µ (-0.78) Tiefe: 10/31 00:00:06 3467kN >37.Ted1 Txd1+ 38.Txd1 Dxh4 39.b5 f4 40.exf4 Dxf4 41.Db2 Kg8 42.Sd6 Dg4 43.Dd4 >Dh4 > µ (-0.75) Tiefe: 10/31 00:00:06 3789kN > ³ (-0.53) Tiefe: 12/33 00:00:16 10341kN >37.h5 gxh5 38.b5 Tg7 39.Db2 Dg5 40.g3 h4 41.De5 Sc7 42.b6 axb6 43.cxb6 > ³ (-0.50) Tiefe: 12/34 00:00:32 20236kN > µ (-1.09) Tiefe: 15/43 00:16:11 611858kN > >Why do many engines waste the h-pawn here, with no obvious reason? Weakening f5 >has no perspective; as it turns out Nc4-d6 can't harm Black. The open g-file is >much to Black's favour. > >Usually I don't see this type of blunder from top engines. Is there something >"computer-specific" which causes 37.h5?? here? The normal move is 37.g3, which >certainly isn't worse than opening an attack file against the own king (?!). > >Thanks, >M.Scheidl > > >P.S. the game: > >[Site "40/1h P3/700"] >[Date "2002.11.14"] >[Round "1.5"] >[White "Shredder 5.32"] >[Black "Ruffian 1.0.1"] >[Result "0-1"] >[ECO "A21"] >[PlyCount "84"] > >1. c4 e5 2. Nc3 c6 3. Nf3 Qc7 4. d4 d6 5. e3 Be7 6. Bd3 Nf6 7. O-O O-O 8. h3 >Na6 9. a3 Bd7 10. Qc2 Rfe8 11. b4 Rad8 12. dxe5 dxe5 13. Ne4 g6 14. Bb2 Nxe4 >15. Bxe4 Bf8 16. Rad1 Bg7 17. Qb3 Be6 18. Ng5 Bc8 19. Bb1 Qe7 20. Nf3 e4 21. >Nd2 f5 22. Bxg7 Qxg7 23. c5+ Be6 24. Nc4 Nc7 25. Qc2 Nb5 26. Ba2 Qc3 27. Qe2 >Rd3 28. Rc1 Qg7 29. Na5 Bxa2 30. Qxa2+ Kf8 31. Nc4 Re7 32. h4 Red7 33. a4 Nc3 >34. Qc2 Nd5 35. Qb1 Qf6 36. Rfe1 Re7 37. h5 gxh5 38. Nd6 Rg7 39. Nc4 f4 40. Qb2 >Qg5 41. f3 fxe3 42. f4 Nxf4 0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.