Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 01:57:47 11/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 23, 2002 at 04:39:25, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 23, 2002 at 04:36:01, Sune Fischer wrote: > >>"Qsearch was working better"? >>SEE shouldn't replace qsearch, it's not that accurate. I use it only for move >>ordering. > >He's thinking of of a *real* SEE, not the thingy some people use >for move ordering and losing captures. Ok, that's a little confusing because SEE is a real buzz word here :) Anyway, I would suggest qsearch, more accurate with respect to dynamics, it's not _that_ slow (10-15% in my program), and it's very simple with just ~40 linies of code. -S. >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.