Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:39:02 11/23/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 23, 2002 at 13:45:44, Brian Kostick wrote: >On November 23, 2002 at 00:04:03, Mustafa wrote: > >>hi MY FRIEND I WAS PLAYING TODAY IN WCN JUST FOR FUN I WAS 2100+ BUT I SAID TO >>MYSELF LET US PLAY SOME GAMES FOR FUN AND LOSE I LOST GAMES AND REACHED SOON >>1000 THEN AN ADMIN CAME ONLINE AND HE SUSPENDED ME WHEN I ASKED WHY HE SAID ME U >>HAVE NO RIGHTS TO LOSE LIKE THAT U HAVE LOSE ON PURPOSE.BUT I DID NOT LOSE ON >>PURPOSE.SO WHAT I SUGGEST U ALL IF UR A MEMBER THERE NEVER BUY A GOLD MEMBERSHIP >>BECAUSE THEY BAN FOR NO REASON THEY SUSPEND FOR NO REASON THEY ARE TOTALLY MAD I >>PAID 43$ US FOR GOLD ACCOUNT BUT THEY SUSPENDED MY GOLD MEMBERSHIP JUST BECAUSE >>I LOST GAMES........... > > >I would like to question the part about losing, or gaining, +1100 points over a >few games. Is this the best the administration (or formula) can do? Seems to >unstable to me. Any thoughts? > >Regrads, >BK No It is clearly possible that some chess program get low rating and improve by 1100 points because the programmer changed it from playing random move to something better. I think that a good rating system should allow change of 1100 points in few games. If 1500 program gets 8 out of 10 in a tournament when the average of the opponents is 2500 then it make sense to give the program 2600. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.