Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: endgame blunder by DeepFritz7

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 22:08:27 11/24/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 24, 2002 at 13:22:46, Terry McCracken wrote:

>On November 24, 2002 at 10:23:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On November 23, 2002 at 19:16:23, Jay Hysenbeg wrote:
>>
>>>On November 23, 2002 at 08:17:02, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>
>>>>On November 23, 2002 at 00:32:08, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On November 23, 2002 at 00:13:32, Terry McCracken wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On November 22, 2002 at 23:45:01, Jay Hysenbeg wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>[D]8/4p3/4Q3/8/8/k1p3PP/1q3P1K/8 w - - 0 1
>>>>>>>wKh2,Qe6,Pf2,g3,h3/bKa3,Qb2,Pc3,e7
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>is this a problem with my deepfritz7 or does this happen with your df7 too. mine
>>>>>>>fails to see that Qxe7 is a loosing line
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Is it certain Qe7 loses?  All I can see is a long series of checks and I don't
>>>>>see how black can find a safe haven from them to promote the pawn...
>>>>>
>>>>>I let Crafty run a while and it says 0.00...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Bob White can't lose, I just inserted the [D] to look at the position.
>>>>
>>>>It looked totally uninteresting.
>>>>
>>>>Terry
>>>chesstiger 15/14 and gambit tiger both see that Qxe7 is losing for white score
>>>jumps by 5 pawns
>>
>>
>>Would you post the "losing" line?  I don't see how black can ever escape the
>>checks.
>
>Bob I looked at it again and it appears I really underestimated the position!
>
>After 1.Qxe7+?? ...Ka2!! going to b1 and it really goes down hill for White
>quickly!
>
>I should have seen this...arrghh! getting rusty...."creak"....sigh...
>
>Terry
>
>P.S. 1...Kb3 is ok I think but Ka2!! and White will have to resign, Black will
>get out of check and promote his pawn.
>
>Try it yourself, you'll see White starts to lose ground for grabbing the pawn.
>
>It's a tricky endgame and Fritz 7 is slower than Tiger to spot the loss.
>HIARCS 8, Junior 7, Shredder 6 all see a lost position but not straight away.
>
>Only Tiger spots it instantly! Bravo Christophe!
>
>
>Juni

I guess that tiger see is based on evaluation and it may see a wrong win when
there is only a draw(I do not know if this is the case).

I expect intelligent programs to see that black is better(unless they can see
that white can force a draw) but I also expect them not to evaluate the position
as +5.

As a human I think that only black can win the endgame so the score should be
better for black unless I see a forced draw.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.