Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 07:19:13 11/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2002 at 02:45:35, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On November 24, 2002 at 23:10:44, Ricardo Gibert wrote: > >>On November 24, 2002 at 15:06:55, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On November 24, 2002 at 14:25:47, Joachim Rang wrote: >>> >>>>On November 24, 2002 at 14:19:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 13:15:09, Bob Durrett wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 11:49:07, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q3/cpu2000-20020909-01635.html >>>>>> >>>>>>Didn't someone say RDRAM was bad for chess? >>>>>> >>>>>>Bob D. >>>>> >>>>>But is still faster than any single processor available with any other memory. >>>>> >>>>>Pichard. >>>> >>>> >>>>Athlon XP 2600+ is 17% faster: >>>>http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q3/cpu2000-20020812-01551.html >>> >>> >>>Really, I must be blind. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >> >>And faster still is the Athlon XP 2800+: >> >>http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q4/cpu2000-20020923-01691.html > > >You are still missing the point here: > >Did you check how many CPU(s)were enabled: = 1 for this test, I did NOT see >CPU(s) enabled: = 2 > >Pichard. Both of guys provide examples with 1 CPU enabled. When I do likewise, I'm somehow missing the point. Okey-dokey, I think I can live with that.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.