Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 11:32:07 11/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2002 at 11:09:48, James T. Walker wrote: >On November 23, 2002 at 13:46:33, Jan Kiwitter wrote: > >>On November 23, 2002 at 13:41:27, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On November 23, 2002 at 11:01:49, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On November 23, 2002 at 11:00:04, Joachim Rang wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 23, 2002 at 08:14:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Deep Fritz will have another miraculous return in the last 6 games just like in >>>>>>the previous matches. I predict a 21 to 19 in favor of Chess Tiger 15. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>where is the return, if you predict another 6 draws? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>:) >>>> >>>>Good point! :) >>>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>> >>> >>>No, I didn't say that I predict 6 more draws, but probably another win or even >>>two for Deep Fritz and the remaining draws. >> >>But then the result cannot be 21-19. >> >>> >>> Pichard > >I'm amazed it's this close. I have played 25 games of Fritz 7 vs Chess Tiger 15 >at G/60min and Fritz 7 leads by 18.5-6.5. Chess Tiger 15 is currently ranked # >22 in my standard database after 101 games. I'm getting miserable results for >Tiger 15-normal. I find it hard to believe it improves dramatically when the >time control is raised to 40/2hours. >Jim Hi! When I played my first test-games (15min/game) with Tiger15 I was blind and didn't noticed that I only used 96kb instead of 96MB. When I changed the hash-size to 96MB it became an new engine. Is it possible that you could have done the same mistake in some of the games? Bertil
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.