Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 11:32:07 11/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 24, 2002 at 11:09:48, James T. Walker wrote: >On November 23, 2002 at 13:46:33, Jan Kiwitter wrote: > >>On November 23, 2002 at 13:41:27, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On November 23, 2002 at 11:01:49, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On November 23, 2002 at 11:00:04, Joachim Rang wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 23, 2002 at 08:14:08, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Deep Fritz will have another miraculous return in the last 6 games just like in >>>>>>the previous matches. I predict a 21 to 19 in favor of Chess Tiger 15. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>where is the return, if you predict another 6 draws? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>:) >>>> >>>>Good point! :) >>>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>> >>> >>>No, I didn't say that I predict 6 more draws, but probably another win or even >>>two for Deep Fritz and the remaining draws. >> >>But then the result cannot be 21-19. >> >>> >>> Pichard > >I'm amazed it's this close. I have played 25 games of Fritz 7 vs Chess Tiger 15 >at G/60min and Fritz 7 leads by 18.5-6.5. Chess Tiger 15 is currently ranked # >22 in my standard database after 101 games. I'm getting miserable results for >Tiger 15-normal. I find it hard to believe it improves dramatically when the >time control is raised to 40/2hours. >Jim Hi! When I played my first test-games (15min/game) with Tiger15 I was blind and didn't noticed that I only used 96kb instead of 96MB. When I changed the hash-size to 96MB it became an new engine. Is it possible that you could have done the same mistake in some of the games? Bertil
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.