Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 11:33:16 11/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2002 at 10:19:13, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >On November 25, 2002 at 02:45:35, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On November 24, 2002 at 23:10:44, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>On November 24, 2002 at 15:06:55, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On November 24, 2002 at 14:25:47, Joachim Rang wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 14:19:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 13:15:09, Bob Durrett wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 11:49:07, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q3/cpu2000-20020909-01635.html >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Didn't someone say RDRAM was bad for chess? >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Bob D. >>>>>> >>>>>>But is still faster than any single processor available with any other memory. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>Athlon XP 2600+ is 17% faster: >>>>>http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q3/cpu2000-20020812-01551.html >>>> >>>> >>>>Really, I must be blind. >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>> >>>And faster still is the Athlon XP 2800+: >>> >>>http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q4/cpu2000-20020923-01691.html >> >> >>You are still missing the point here: >> >>Did you check how many CPU(s)were enabled: = 1 for this test, I did NOT see >>CPU(s) enabled: = 2 >> >>Pichard. > > >Both of guys provide examples with 1 CPU enabled. When I do likewise, I'm >somehow missing the point. Okey-dokey, I think I can live with that. Sorry, I meant to say all of you missed the point, but at the same time when only 1 CPU is enabled, the Intel can not compete with any Athlon XP 2600+ or higher. Now if AMD release a Dual 2400 MP, it will beat the @#$+ out of Intel higher Xeon. Pichard.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.