Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 13:29:39 11/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 25, 2002 at 16:00:56, Brian Richardson wrote: >On November 25, 2002 at 14:33:16, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On November 25, 2002 at 10:19:13, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >> >>>On November 25, 2002 at 02:45:35, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On November 24, 2002 at 23:10:44, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >>>> >>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 15:06:55, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 14:25:47, Joachim Rang wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 14:19:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 13:15:09, Bob Durrett wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>On November 24, 2002 at 11:49:07, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q3/cpu2000-20020909-01635.html >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Didn't someone say RDRAM was bad for chess? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>Bob D. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>But is still faster than any single processor available with any other memory. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Pichard. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Athlon XP 2600+ is 17% faster: >>>>>>>http://www.specbench.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q3/cpu2000-20020812-01551.html >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Really, I must be blind. >>>>>> >>>>>>Pichard. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>And faster still is the Athlon XP 2800+: >>>>> >>>>>http://www.spec.org/osg/cpu2000/results/res2002q4/cpu2000-20020923-01691.html >>>> >>>> >>>>You are still missing the point here: >>>> >>>>Did you check how many CPU(s)were enabled: = 1 for this test, I did NOT see >>>>CPU(s) enabled: = 2 >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>> >>>Both of guys provide examples with 1 CPU enabled. When I do likewise, I'm >>>somehow missing the point. Okey-dokey, I think I can live with that. >> >> >>Sorry, I meant to say all of you missed the point, but at the same time when >>only 1 CPU is enabled, the Intel can not compete with any Athlon XP 2600+ or >>higher. Now if AMD release a Dual 2400 MP, it will beat the @#$+ out of Intel >>higher Xeon. >> >>Pichard. > >Actually, just the opposite has been shown for 32bit AMD >(e.g., slower than dual Xeon). > >Brian Probably for the Dual 2200+ but NOT for the upcoming Dual 2400+ MP http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.html?i=1747&p=10 And http://www.anandtech.com/IT/showdoc.html?i=1747&p=12 Pichard.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.