Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 19:32:28 11/25/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 22, 2002 at 20:05:17, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On November 22, 2002 at 19:57:40, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On November 22, 2002 at 17:43:13, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >> >>>On November 22, 2002 at 17:29:35, Dave Gomboc wrote: >>> >>>>On November 22, 2002 at 07:26:02, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >>>> >>>>>I expect it to do better at longer times too of course, for the reason >>>>>pointed out in this thread than it becomes more comparable to R=3. R=3 is >>>>>superior in Deep Sjeng compared to verified R=3, so as verified gets >>>>>closer to R=3, it will do better, but I don't expect it to do >>>>>"better than R=3". >>>>> >>>>>I have different testing priorities right now because in any case it >>>>>looks vastly inferior to what I am doing now (not R=3 and not R=2/3). >>>> >>>>What are you doing now? >>> >>>Ultra-Secret-Commercial-Hyper-Mega-Pruning-Technique XBHY-356 >>> >>>:) >>> >>>-- >>>GCP >> >>So you're not going to write it up and publish it? > >No. Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned it - it's not really fair >to Omir as he does publish his stuff. In that case, I'll take it as a courtesy if you don't criticize any work I happen to publish because it uses node counts instead of wall clock timings. Dave
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.