Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Verified Null-Move Pruning, ICGA 25(3)

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 11:45:58 11/26/02

Go up one level in this thread


On November 26, 2002 at 13:57:55, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On November 26, 2002 at 12:18:10, Omid David Tabibi wrote:
>
>>On November 26, 2002 at 07:09:07, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>
>>>On November 25, 2002 at 22:32:28, Dave Gomboc wrote:
>>>
>>>>>No. Maybe I shouldn't have mentioned it - it's not really fair
>>>>>to Omir as he does publish his stuff.
>>>>
>>>>In that case, I'll take it as a courtesy if you don't criticize any work I
>>>>happen to publish because it uses node counts instead of wall clock timings.
>>>
>>>I don't think it's fair to say 'what you published is crap, I have
>>>something much better but I'm not telling you what and I'm not going
>>>to publish it or post test results from it'.
>>>
>>>I think it's fair to say 'what you published is crap because you did
>>>not test it correctly and you compared only to inferior methods whereas
>>>better methods were already known and published'
>>>
>>>I don't think it's fair to criticise Omir because his scheme does
>>>not work in my engine. I think it's fair to criticise him because
>>>he did not include Heinz scheme in his tests.
>>>
>>
>>What do you mean by "he did not include Heinz scheme in his tests"?
>>
>>Omid (not Omir!)
>
>He probably means adaptive R in null-move.
>

Yes, and I replied at http://talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?267536

>
>>
>>
>>>Even though he did not test nodes or time to solution and I think
>>>it's necessary to do so, I'm not going to criticise him for not doing
>>>so, although I'll explain why I think it's needed. Omir is young and
>>>to get published it is easier to do as has been done before you because
>>>it will get you accepted more easily.
>>>
>>>But please consider that many breakthroughs were made because people
>>>_didn't_ do that.
>>>
>>>I'll applaud the first one to publish an academic paper to use
>>>nodes (if NPS is proven to be unaffected by the change) or time to
>>>solution as the primary measure in the test results.
>>>
>>>If that's you, then, well
>>>
>>>*clap* *clap* *clap* *clap*
>>>
>>>--
>>>GCP



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.