Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 11:12:51 11/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2002 at 10:49:25, Dana Turnmire wrote: >On November 27, 2002 at 09:33:45, Ricardo R Santana wrote: > >>Hello All >> >>From Kurt Utzinger and Harald Faber, it seems CM9000 could beat the top chess >>programs. I agree with SSDF not test these "program configurations" because if >>they do so, everybody (I mean every chess programmer) would send them a "new" >>setup. Ok..this is true !! >> >>BUT, ITS AMAZING the CM9000 results !! So, I think everybody (every chess >>program user) would like to see CM9000-utz in SSDF list !!! So, I think SSDF is >>for people like us (chess program user) - so, why NOT ? >> >>Thanks >>Ricardo Sant Ana > >I'm sure it would be illegal for John Merlino to issue a patch making the >CM_Utzinger settings the default personality. As far as Ubisoft doing such a >thing even if it is proven beyond a doubt CM_Utzinger is the strongest setting I >would think is zil to none. Probably the the only thing that could happen is if >Johan de Koning reads the posts here he may adjust the default settings when the >new version comes out. As far as I know, Ubisoft has the policy to sell the Chessmaster with an all around setting, doing well at blitz/rapid/tournament levels. And in this respect, I must admit that there are better setting for blitz games than CM9_Utz12n. Not being interested myself in blitz games I do however not care, the more so since the important title of world chess computer champion can only be obtained with play at higher time controls. Kurt http://www.beepworld.de/members39/utzinger
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.