Author: Joshua Haglund
Date: 11:39:34 11/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2002 at 10:52:09, bobby palacios wrote: >[D] r3qrk1/pp1b3p/1nn1pbp1/3p2N1/3P4/2N5/PPB2PPP/R1BQR1K1 w - - 0 17 > > >Here is a position that occured in a game between Ruffian vs Hiarcs 7.32 at game >in 25. Ruffian won the game with a brilliant attack, but does Hiarcs 7.32 have >better defensive moves? > >The game continued: > >17. Nxh7 Kxh7 18.Qh5+ Kg8 19.Bxg6 Qe7 20.Re3 Be8 21.Rg3 Bxg6 22.Rxg6+ Bg7 >23. Bh6 Rf5 24. Qg4 Rf7 25. Re1 e5 26. Qh5 Qe8 27.Nb5 Nc4 28. b3 a6 29. Nc3 Nb6 >30. dxe5 Re7 31. Qg5 Qf8 32. Re3 Nd4 33. Rxb6 Rc8 34. Rf6 Qe8 35. Rg6 Qf8 >36. Bxg7 Rxg7 37. Qh5 Rxg6 38. Qxg6+ 1-0 If I were playing this game I would of definately taken the h7 pawn! I came up with a Sicilian version along with an Advanced version of the French Defense that led to a rather quick mate. While my rating is only around twenty two hundred, I think if a computer isn't programmed good enough, if it doen't even consider the gamble or possiblity of such a sacrafice, it's not programmed well enough. Joshua toneewa@yahoo.com
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.