Author: Rick Terry
Date: 12:32:22 11/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2002 at 11:43:22, Harald Faber wrote: >On November 27, 2002 at 09:33:45, Ricardo R Santana wrote: > >>Hello All >> >>From Kurt Utzinger and Harald Faber, it seems CM9000 could beat the top chess >>programs. I agree with SSDF not test these "program configurations" because if >>they do so, everybody (I mean every chess programmer) would send them a "new" >>setup. Ok..this is true !! >> >>BUT, ITS AMAZING the CM9000 results !! So, I think everybody (every chess >>program user) would like to see CM9000-utz in SSDF list !!! So, I think SSDF is >>for people like us (chess program user) - so, why NOT ? >> >>Thanks >>Ricardo Sant Ana > > >Personally, I don't mind whether SSDF tests CM 9000 Utz12n or not. For me it is >obvious that this setup - CM 9000 Utz12n + Kostick book - is among the peer >group DeepFritz 7, ChessTiger 15, Shredder Paderborn, Ruffian 1.0.1 (and Junior >7). Maybe CM 9000 Utz12n does not even need the Kostick book... Ruffian 1.0??? do you think it deserves to be mentioned along with deepfritz7 and the others?
This page took 2.2 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.