Author: Rick Terry
Date: 12:32:22 11/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2002 at 11:43:22, Harald Faber wrote: >On November 27, 2002 at 09:33:45, Ricardo R Santana wrote: > >>Hello All >> >>From Kurt Utzinger and Harald Faber, it seems CM9000 could beat the top chess >>programs. I agree with SSDF not test these "program configurations" because if >>they do so, everybody (I mean every chess programmer) would send them a "new" >>setup. Ok..this is true !! >> >>BUT, ITS AMAZING the CM9000 results !! So, I think everybody (every chess >>program user) would like to see CM9000-utz in SSDF list !!! So, I think SSDF is >>for people like us (chess program user) - so, why NOT ? >> >>Thanks >>Ricardo Sant Ana > > >Personally, I don't mind whether SSDF tests CM 9000 Utz12n or not. For me it is >obvious that this setup - CM 9000 Utz12n + Kostick book - is among the peer >group DeepFritz 7, ChessTiger 15, Shredder Paderborn, Ruffian 1.0.1 (and Junior >7). Maybe CM 9000 Utz12n does not even need the Kostick book... Ruffian 1.0??? do you think it deserves to be mentioned along with deepfritz7 and the others?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.