Author: Harald Faber
Date: 13:54:38 11/27/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 27, 2002 at 15:32:22, Rick Terry wrote: >On November 27, 2002 at 11:43:22, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On November 27, 2002 at 09:33:45, Ricardo R Santana wrote: >> >>>Hello All >>> >>>From Kurt Utzinger and Harald Faber, it seems CM9000 could beat the top chess >>>programs. I agree with SSDF not test these "program configurations" because if >>>they do so, everybody (I mean every chess programmer) would send them a "new" >>>setup. Ok..this is true !! >>> >>>BUT, ITS AMAZING the CM9000 results !! So, I think everybody (every chess >>>program user) would like to see CM9000-utz in SSDF list !!! So, I think SSDF is >>>for people like us (chess program user) - so, why NOT ? >>> >>>Thanks >>>Ricardo Sant Ana >> >> >>Personally, I don't mind whether SSDF tests CM 9000 Utz12n or not. For me it is >>obvious that this setup - CM 9000 Utz12n + Kostick book - is among the peer >>group DeepFritz 7, ChessTiger 15, Shredder Paderborn, Ruffian 1.0.1 (and Junior >>7). Maybe CM 9000 Utz12n does not even need the Kostick book... > > >Ruffian 1.0??? do you think it deserves to be mentioned along with deepfritz7 >and the others? Yes, definitely!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.