Author: Amir Ban
Date: 16:09:16 09/16/98
Go up one level in this thread
On September 16, 1998 at 12:09:31, blass uri wrote: >I believe a slow searcher can be better because you must have a slow searcher to >evaluate which lines are more important to analyze. > >I think that a slow searcher can be better also in test positions than fast >searcher because of this reason. > >What do you think about it? This question is phrased badly. All things being equal of course you prefer a fast searcher over a slow one. You must define what makes a searcher "slow", or maybe you don't know, but you are assuming that everybody else here knows what makes a slow searcher different from a fast searcher, which is not true. Amir
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.