Author: Will Singleton
Date: 09:28:49 11/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2002 at 07:50:59, Frank Phillips wrote: >On November 28, 2002 at 20:38:22, Volker Richey wrote: > >>On November 28, 2002 at 14:43:58, David Rasmussen wrote: >> >>>I suddenly can't find anything about it: >>> >>>What information is supposed to be kibitzed during play/search? >>> >>>/David >> >>Your are right. There must be shown an example at the cct5-site. >> >>The current evaluation, depth, book or not, tablebases (if yes, how many >>moves picked from the tablebases), predicted moves, may be the >>first 2 moves are enough. >> >>Other variations are welcome. >> >>Volker > >First of all Volker thank you for organising the tournament, again. No doubt >you will get more suggestions than support. > >When the rules are finalised (and only then) I think it would be helpful to post >them on your site. There has been some discussion in CCC on possible options, >but as far as I can tell no visible conclusion. > >On the kibitzing (which I support) it may be helpful to be as clear as possible, >but also as flexible as possible. I imagine the intention is to have some >evidence that the engine produced the move itself. > >I think I understand your suggested scheme above, although the first two moves >of the PV will cause me a problem sometimes as I do not extract the PV from the >hash table. > >Frank I think the intention of the kibitz requirement is to indicate automatic operation, and not to specify the exact data output. I don't think Volker is going to make anyone change his output to conform to some arbitrary standard. His existing rules, posted on his site, look good enough to me. Will
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.