Author: Uri Blass
Date: 15:18:34 11/29/02
Go up one level in this thread
On November 29, 2002 at 18:12:13, Uri Blass wrote: >On November 29, 2002 at 17:58:22, Will Singleton wrote: > >>On November 29, 2002 at 17:30:45, Russell Reagan wrote: >> >>>On November 29, 2002 at 17:22:20, Will Singleton wrote: >>> >>>>[D]2rr3k/1p4p1/1P2b2p/p1Bnpp1q/8/Q1P2PP1/P6P/RB3RK1 b - - 0 26 >>>> >>>>Solution times (amd 1.6ghz): >>>> >>>>Yace not in 5 min >>>>Crafty not in 5 min >>>>Aristarch 3:48 min >>>>Gromit 3:12 min >>>>Ruffian 44 sec >>>>CM9000 5 sec >>>> >>>>Seems like the strong amateurs are using pruning techniques that cause the >>>>solution to be missed. Ruffian and Yace have no problem, perhaps they don't use >>>>null move in the way others do? >>> >>>"Ruffian and Yace have no problem"...your results say Yace doesn't get it in >>>five minutes. >>> >> >>Sorry, I meant Ruffian and CM9000 have no problem. >> >>Will > >Latest Movei(PIII850Mhz) see fail high in more than 7 minutes >It still did not solve the fail high problem at the time of writing these lines >I guess that it can be translated to less than 5 minutes on amd 1.6Mhz > >depth=12 +1.45 d5f4 >Nodes: 58146510 NPS: 134826 >Time: 00:07:11.27 >depth=12 +1.74 d5f4 >Nodes: 77088395 NPS: 133820 >Time: 00:09:36.06 > > >Uri Here is more analysis depth=12 +2.72 d5f4 g3f4 d8d2 c5f2 h5f3 a3a5 e6d5 a5d5 f3d5 b1f5 c8f8 c3c4 d5c4 Nodes: 133255780 NPS: 132683 Time: 00:16:44.31 Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.